Over-the-top PR fails to save Margot Robbie’s ‘Wuthering Heights’

Despite stunning craftsmanship, the adaptation prioritizes vibes over the psychological violence central to Brontë’s novel.

Emerald Fennell’s Wuthering Heights is dressed in all the trappings of prestige cinema: star power, beautiful production values, and marketing that promises something bold and new in the classic Emily Brontë novel from 1847. What fans get is something far thinner: a glossy, hyper-sensualized version that replaces the emotional brutality and social commentary of the original with feelings, longing gazes, and visual overload.

With Margot Robbie playing Cathy and Jacob Elordi playing Heathcliff, Wuthering Heights reduces one of literature’s most passionate love stories to a series of sultry tableaux. The film is clearly far more interested in erotic tension and gothic melodrama than in the real meat of the original: class cruelty, obsession, abuse, and how love can curdle into revenge. The film is now mood board cinema: slow motion, wind in hair, bodies pressed together in intensity without purpose or effect.

Glossy visuals and star power dilute Wuthering Heights

One of the biggest problems is Heathcliff. The original Heathcliff is one of literature’s great anti-heroes: terrifying in his cruelty, wounded in his love, shaped by his experiences of rejection and rage. The Heathcliff in Wuthering Heights is simply a tortured heartthrob. He is treated like a mythical figure in a fantasy romance, emerging from fog and towering over Cathy (Margot Robbie) in dramatic poses until all sense of danger or moral complexity is drained from him. The fan of the original is likely to feel what is missing very quickly.

While Wuthering Heights is beautiful to look at, with production values that make the moor landscapes dreamlike and uncanny, style is again overpowering substance. Every frame is screaming with significance, but the story is again becoming very simplistic.

The biggest crime is that Wuthering Heights completely fails to address issues of race and class. By removing these issues entirely, Wuthering Heights removes what made Wuthering Heights both radical and subversive in the first place.

Wuthering Heights is not an adaptation; Wuthering Heights is an aesthetic remix. Beautiful, provocative, empty. It wants to be daring and transgressive; it wants to be seen as bold and new. It is none of these.

You may also like
Sumedha Chatterjee
Sumedha Chatterjee

Sumedha Chatterjee is a Delhi University graduate who studied Geography, a subject that deepened her fascination with how cultures and regions shape the way we experience cinema and art. Her love for storytelling began at an early age, surrounded by theatricals, cultural performances, and books that celebrated the art of creativity. What started as childhood wonder has grown into a passion for exploring films and expressing them through words. She strives to be a wordsmith who captures not just the craft of cinema but the emotions it stirs, weaving together thoughtful and relatable narratives.

When she isn’t writing, Sumedha can be found binge-watching The Big Bang Theory, laughing at the clever chaos of Gintama, or crocheting little pieces of joy. With every step forward, she hopes to bring fresh insight and warmth to the worlds of film criticism and cultural writing.

Articles: 860

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *